Here’s the thing. I don’t like to drink all that much on Sunday and really like to avoid drinking on Monday. It’s not that I plan when I do but have always liked clear days. And, for other reasons, I have to stay clear anyway. But I was asked to present some IPAs to some good beery people tonight and, well, that’s usually too interesting to pass up. So, I am going to get thinking about the stink of beer. I was over in northern NY Friday, bought a bunch of strong if not stenchily aromatic IPAs and plan to do a few experiments in smell-o-logy. I hope to finally prove the speed of smell. I am planning to see if anyone shouts out the word “parsley!!!” without prompting. And I also plan to see if we can find out how long beer people can go without actually sipping.
Should be fun. More later when the results start coming in. Any other experiments you suggest I impose upon the lab rats?
Update: A fairly focused range of beers can still illustrate a wide range of concepts about beer. I brought Oskar Blues Dales Pale Ale, Sixpoint Bengali Tiger, Stone Arrogant Bastard, Firestone Walker Double Jack, Anderson Valley Imperial IPA and Stoudt Double IPA. Beau’s poured its Beaver River I.P.Eh. So here is some of what we thought about:
♦ Brand theme. Stone was compared to Sixpoint. Both have very iconic imagery but Stone conveys all that gargoyle content while Sixpoint is much more subtle… not hard while you think of it. Both identify but only one irritates. But does it matter as long as it identifies? Anderson Valley looked like a 70s album cover but we were unclear on Zep or Yes.
♦ Price point. The Sixpoint was the cheapest beer (at $5.00 per litre) but stood out with the Firestone Walker (at $12 per litre) as the more tasty two of the set. This got is us into a conversation about who is the market for beer that go from $12 to $20 per litre and beyond.
♦ Regionalist tastes. Stoudt at 10% had a butter note that got us into diacetyl while the Anderson Valley gave us hard water. I suggested this might be an east coast v. west coast phenomenon. We talked about some of the earthy notes in Quebec beers that you don’t see elsewhere, too.
♦ Speed of smell. I clocked it at about 4 inches a second.
♦ Memory and taste. I wondered how much of taste and memory is the mind triggering taste associations as much as tastes and smell takes us back to a former place. I thought we unpack the mix of flavours in a given beer – and one that is very similar to the last and next beers – and our brain seeks to differentiate through distinguishing associations.
Finally, what I really learned is that you can lead a tasting without tasting. You get to ask questions and listen. I find that usually much more interesting than hearing what I think.
[Original comments…]
Bailey – February 6, 2012 11:40 AM
http://boakandbailey.com
Concealing or changing the colour can be fun…
steve – February 6, 2012 1:36 PM
http://beersiveknown.blogspot.com
pegs on the noses to taste before taking off to show how much of taste is smell
Craig – February 6, 2012 3:20 PM
http://drinkdrank1.blogspot.com/
I don’t think I could smell anything today. My olfactory nerve has been seared by Superbowl induced, Buffalo wing sauce.
Ethan – February 7, 2012 2:16 PM
http://communitybeerworks.com
Nicely played, sir! thoughts on thoughts:
1) Stone v. Sixpoint: Sixpoint is hearkening back to an older, beer-design ethos, I feel, very industrial, utilitarian- content is king, form is function. Stone is going at once both more ‘romantic’ (in it’s original sense) and… dangerous. But I think in both cases, their design is well-aligned with their beer-making ethos. ethoses? Whichever. I’ll never forget reading the copy on an Arrogant Bastard for the first time, and saying back to the bottle “Screw you, ‘I’m not worthy’: watch me like the crap out of this beer” BrewDog is a pale imitation of Stone in this respect.
2) I don’t price my beer by the litre, though I could give it a try. I’d also have to convert $CDN to greenbacks, but then I’d also have to account for Canada’s tax vagaries vs. America’s, then consider the distribution and import levels, etc. It’s hard to call it apples-to-apples, were I to do the same analysis, is my point. The metric I fear many consumers use is ratio of cost to ABV, though there is some validity to it, too; higher ABV beers must cost more to make. They also keep longer and ought be drunk in lower volume, which one might expect to be a force of parity, but that’s not the case in reality.
3) Regionalisms Of Tastes indeed: the people of Syracuse have a tolerance for diacetyl that I sure cannot get behind, but I still wish Middle Ages the best.
4) The speed of smell < the speed of suck. 5) Pretty sure both directions are at play: bottom-up, as flavor triggers associations, and top-down, as memory connects to more associations and the flavors then become names which themselves feed more associations, recursively, until you quit and just experience it.