New Lew

There are days – often called Monday – when you wake up wondering why you wrote that two years ago, what you are going to say at the seminar and why you never followed up on that dream you had at 21 to mow Fenway. Then…you find out the noisy neighbours have moved out and that what you wrote is not what it was being taken for AND your copy of the newly published text Virginia, Maryland & Delaware Breweries (includes Washington DC) by Lew Bryson was delivered today! The third in the series after NY and PA and I am sure as good – especially as he has that chapter on “Regional Foods” through which I learned to seek out, from the volume on NY, the hot and the garbage plate. Don’t you all really need a copy?

You will probably find some deeper delving in the next few days at the beer blog. Way to go, Lew.

Wacked

I do not think I have ever played to a 0-0 tie in a soccer game before last night. It was hardly a slack affair with cross after cross off my golden right boot…ok, in my mind at least. Going through the kit bag this morning I even have a massive grass stain across the middle of my back. There is a comfort in knowing the corpse can take a pounding like that at 42 and more than that in pounds overweight.

Aches and pains. Aches and pains. Time for Tiger Balm on toast.

New York: Southern Tier Brewing, Lakewood

I have written about Southern Tier‘s porter a couple of times and reviewed the IPA. All but the Hop Sun were in a variety twelve along with the porter that I picked up at the beginning of July – again obeying the golden rule of variety twelves (all ales and four styles please). I have enjoyed everything they have thrown at me and here are a few more:

    • Phin and Matt’s Extraordinary Ale: white rim over light amber brew. Quite fruity – apricot and peach – in the malt. Kind of like a bigger Magic Hat #9. It is also a bit unconventional in the taste structuring. The hops hit a wee bit early and the malt opens up after. A nice semi-sweet amber ale. The effect of the hops and yeast is creamy vegetative. Interesting for something of an everyday ale. Advocators say yay.
      • Triple: white foam over deep straw with a sweet boozy nose. Smooth rich Belgian-style pale malt – a little less severe than most triples – if candy can be severe. It is sweet with flavours of candy floss and corn on the cob…yet still musty like a biere de garde. Very fine but the BAers have issues.
    • IPA: I really like this beer as well. White rim over a really attractive medium brown, like antique patina of cherrywood. Isn’t that just about the lamest thing I have ever written – except it is true…or at least trueish. The malt fruitiness is autumn apple over cream yeast. Not a hop bomb like, say, Ithaca Flower Power, but a rather nice balance of malt sweet, bit of heat and bitter greens. The effect is something like well oaked chardonnay – if chardonnay were made of grain and not grapes. I reviewed this last year at the same link as the Flower Power above and found it more spicy than green. As of today, ninety-nine advocates all say yes.
    • Hop Sun Wheat: I noticed this beer rated highly with the Beer Beacon’s column called “Beers of Summer” in the August/September issue of Great Lakes Brewing News, one of the excellent trade papers published by Brewing News of East Amherst, NY. The beer’s head falls quickly back to a white rim over medium-light straw. The ale is crisp by which I mean the bitter green hops are a nicely balanced sharp taste at the front of your mouth. Blending with the green hops are some green grass notes from the biscuity core of wheat malt. Beyond these two there is a high note of lemon as well as deeper ones of green apple and maybe apricot. All bright lightly acidic flavours. So for summer sip, this is well structured and flavourful even if it is 4.3% and at the light end of mouthfeel that I can put up with. I hate wondering if I missed my mouth. All 40 at the BA like it.

Chemerinsky v. Tribe

I still need an good introductory text to US constitutional law…introductory for someone who has done six or so years involved in the acquisition of law degrees, that is. I am considering – for work and for play – acquiring Chemerinsky’s text Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies.

I have also been recommended Lawrence Tribe’s American Constitutional Law from the best of advisors (and have enjoyed the one by him I have read) but am now concerned that it is a 1978 text and apparently only a first volume of a never completed two text set.

Comments? Critiques?

Knobs

I was thinking about how much I start at screens in the average day. Cathode ray tubes mainly. At work. At play.

But then I thought that that is not the true winner as most invasive modern trinket. It’s really the little plastic knob – the switch, the botton, the key, the slide, the thingie. Do the designers of these things ever get together either as an association or under an evil plan? They have virtually eliminated the toggle…what else?

High Proportion?

What does it say about a country when one of your top judges says this as was quoted by the BBC in relation to the longer pub hours coming to England soon:

Judge Charles Harris QC was particularly critical of the plans, saying a high proportion of British people become “pugnacious and bellicose” after drinking. He contrasted this to the continental drinking habits, where people “sit quietly chatting away at cafe tables”.

Nice to know that the guy in charge of sentencing British people thinks so highly of them.

Treason!

The good Flea makes an empassioned plea for the use of the charge of treason against those who would bomb we citizens in a twisted and pointless efforts to over-throw democracy. They do not know that the very rocks and trees of the Canadian Shield would vote somewhere between 12 and 18% for NPD every 3.5 to 4.5 years if we were all blown to bits taking mass trans of a morning.

But there is still reason to review our law and…did you know…there is still both high and also regular ethanol treason here in the law of the Great White North:

46. (1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,

(a) kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;
(b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or
(c) assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.

(2) Every one commits treason who, in Canada,

(a) uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;
(b) without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada;
(c) conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);
(d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or
(e) conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act.

(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1) or (2), a Canadian citizen or a person who owes allegiance to Her Majesty in right of Canada,

(a) commits high treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (1); or
(b) commits treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (2).

(4) Where it is treason to conspire with any person, the act of conspiring is an overt act of treason.

So even though we have newish post-9/11 trendy terrorism crimes set out in Part II.1 of the Act, there is some pretty beefy good old Victorian things to think about in the sweet section of the Criminal Code of Canada pasted above. Sadly, while we may bicker about “what is war,” high treason is perhaps beyond the scope of your average un-nationed freelance early 21st century jihadista – unless they go for the Queen – but it is nice to note, personally at least, that conspiring for the violent over-throw of Saskatchewan whether one is at home or away is treason nonetheless.

And it is a nice touch that the minimum sentence for high treason is life under 47(4).